when sending through horde the result will be:
==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check: pass
DomainKeys check: neutral
DKIM check: neutral
Sender-ID check: pass
SpamAssassin check: ham
==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================
HELO hostname: mail.bigmichi1.de
Source IP: 188.40.84.226
mail-from: michael@bigmichi1.de
----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=michael@bigmichi1.de
DNS record(s):
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx mx:mail.bigmichi1.de -all"
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN MX 10 mail.bigmichi1.de.
srv03.bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN A 188.40.84.226
----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=michael@bigmichi1.de
DNS record(s):
----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified:
NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.
----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=michael@bigmichi1.de
DNS record(s):
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx mx:mail.bigmichi1.de -all"
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN MX 10 mail.bigmichi1.de.
srv03.bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN A 188.40.84.226
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.2.5 (2008-06-10)
Result: ham (0.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
-0.7 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20%
[score: 0.1824]
-0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
when sending through thunderbird from my home machine the result is:
==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check: pass
DomainKeys check: neutral
DKIM check: pass
Sender-ID check: pass
SpamAssassin check: ham
==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================
HELO hostname: mail.bigmichi1.de
Source IP: 188.40.84.226
mail-from: michael@bigmichi1.de
----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=michael@bigmichi1.de
DNS record(s):
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx mx:mail.bigmichi1.de -all"
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN MX 10 mail.bigmichi1.de.
srv03.bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN A 188.40.84.226
----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=michael@bigmichi1.de
DNS record(s):
----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass (matches From: michael@bigmichi1.de)
ID(s) verified: header.d=bigmichi1.de
Canonicalized Headers:
content-transfer-encoding:7bit'0D''0A'
content-type:text/plain;'20'charset=ISO-8859-15;'20'format=flowed'0D''0A'
subject:Check'0D''0A'
to:check-auth@verifier.port25.com'0D''0A'
mime-version:1.0'0D''0A'
user-agent:Thunderbird'20'2.0.0.23'20'(Windows/20090812)'0D''0A'
from:Michael'20'Cramer'20'<michael@bigmichi1.de>'0D''0A'
date:Sat,'20'14'20'Nov'20'2009'20'13:33:57'20'+0100'0D''0A'
message-id:<4AFEA3B5.2030507@bigmichi1.de>'0D''0A'
x-virus-scanned:Debian'20'amavisd-new'20'at'20'mail.bigmichi1.de'0D''0A'
dkim-signature:v=1;'20'a=rsa-sha256;'20'c=relaxed/simple;'20'd=bigmichi1.de;'20'h='20'content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:to:mime-version'20':user-agent:from:date:message-id:x-virus-scanned;'20's=dkim;'20't='20'1258205711;'20'x=1259069711;'20'bh=frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKd'20'LCPjaYaY=;'20'b=
Canonicalized Body:
'0D''0A'
DNS record(s):
dkim._domainkey.bigmichi1.de. 3600 IN TXT "v=DKIM1; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDd7Ayf1dZ1ycq2lEO2rH7YJVL1luac4pKSZd1B+JwjXQezZECL26kz4ko3WMLMXnXQSBxLQa2NUeUIhz/BoEBqJXacETzYYKM95Q5gHWA/oec57A/Vf26Mxy8jNRKYF+WSFYuqL7fZUff9frWyF7wlDz0acS+jVVwILQ9vvh7bgwIDAQAB"
NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.
----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=michael@bigmichi1.de
DNS record(s):
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx mx:mail.bigmichi1.de -all"
bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN MX 10 mail.bigmichi1.de.
srv03.bigmichi1.de. 86400 IN A 188.40.84.226
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.2.5 (2008-06-10)
Result: ham (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
in both cases one check fails, any solutions or hints for that failing test?
also any suggestion, tip, hint for the different behavior?