==== REQUIRED BASIC INFO OF YOUR IREDMAIL SERVER ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release):
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version:
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL):
- Web server (Apache or Nginx):
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro?
- [IMPORTANT] Related original log or error message is required if you're experiencing an issue.
======== REQUIRED BASIC INFO OF YOUR IREDMAIL SERVER ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release):  0.9.7
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Centos  6.9
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL):  MySQL
- Web server (Apache or Nginx): Apache
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? NO
- [IMPORTANT] Related original log or error message is required if you're experiencing an issue.
====

I have noticed that my logwatch is showing the wrong version's for clamav
--------------------- clam-update Begin ------------------------

Last ClamAV update process started at Wed Jul 11 03:50:05 2018

Last Status:
    WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
    WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version: 0.100.1
    DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/documents/upgrading-clamav
    main.cvd is up to date (version: 58, sigs: 4566249, f-level: 60, builder: sigmgr)
    Downloading daily-24740.cdiff [100%]
    Downloading daily-24741.cdiff [100%]
    Downloading daily-24742.cdiff [100%]
    daily.cld updated (version: 24742, sigs: 2010062, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
    bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 324, sigs: 89, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
    Database updated (6576400 signatures) from db.local.clamav.net (IP: 104.16.189.138)

---------------------- clam-update End -------------------------

Yet when I search for the installed version it is on the latest version, and freshclam reports its all up to date.

# rpm -qa | grep clam
clamav-db-0.100.1-1.el6.x86_64
clamd-0.100.1-1.el6.x86_64
clamav-0.100.1-1.el6.x86_64

# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Thu Jul 12 11:36:17 2018
main.cvd is up to date (version: 58, sigs: 4566249, f-level: 60, builder: sigmgr)
daily.cld is up to date (version: 24746, sigs: 2011430, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
bytecode.cvd is up to date (version: 324, sigs: 89, f-level: 63, builder: neo)

Do you know why this may be happening.

Andrew