1 Topic by mkr

  • mkr
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2023-05-08
  • Posts: 15

Topic: Large installations

==== REQUIRED BASIC INFO OF YOUR IREDMAIL SERVER ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 1.6.3
- Deployed with iRedMail Easy or the downloadable installer?Installer
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Alma
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): MySQL
- Web server (Apache or Nginx):Nginx
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro?No
- [IMPORTANT] Related original log or error message is required if you're experiencing an issue.
====

We have 20000 mailboxes in Zimbra and planning to shift to Iredmail. 1000 users will be online at any point of time. Can Iredmail take this load? What are your suggestions for sizing and which backend to choose?

----

Spider Email Archiver: On-Premises, lightweight email archiving software developed by iRedMail team. Supports Amazon S3 compatible storage and custom branding.

2 Reply by dave.opc

  • dave.opc
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2019-07-08
  • Posts: 103

Re: Large installations

it depends on the hardware, not iredmail

3 Reply by ZhangHuangbin

  • ZhangHuangbin
  • ZhangHuangbin
  • iRedMail Developers
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2009-05-06
  • Posts: 31,082

Re: Large installations

What's the hardware spec?

4 Reply by mkr

  • mkr
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2023-05-08
  • Posts: 15

Re: Large installations

Hi Zhang,

Currently Zimbra is running fine with CPU: 8 Sockets(1 core per socket )  and RAM: 8 GB. As Zimbra is storing mails metadata in mariadb, its faster in rendering. What performance guidelines and sizing you suggest for larger installations.

5 Reply by ZhangHuangbin

  • ZhangHuangbin
  • ZhangHuangbin
  • iRedMail Developers
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2009-05-06
  • Posts: 31,082

Re: Large installations

If Zimbra is fine, then iRedMail should be fine too.

6 Reply by mkr

  • mkr
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2023-05-08
  • Posts: 15

Re: Large installations

Hi Zhang
What do you suggest for larger installations: LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL for performance based on your experience?

7 Reply by Cthulhu

  • Cthulhu
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2019-06-04
  • Posts: 907

Re: Large installations

pgsql performs better with very large datasets and heavy concurrent read/write operations